The work of W. Congreve is located at the intersection of literary epochs: between the period of Restoration and Enlightenment. The article examines the motive of hypocrisy in William Congreve’s comedy «The Double Dealer» (1693). This motif runs through the entire work and concerns not only the actions of the main character’s rival Proyd, but also the minor characters: Lady Truehldub, Lady Slyble and Lady Balderdash. Researchers note the connection of this play with the comedy of William Wycherley «The Plain Dealer», and the image of Proyd, which goes back to the literary type of hypocrite, is compared with Tartuffe. The motive of hypocrisy, in addition to conducting a skillful intrigue, is realized through the image of a mask, as well as a grin, which is perceived as ambiguity. The play is perceived as an instruction comedy, a lesson. Hypocrisy is opposed to the truth, which, in the end, triumphs. Despite the fact that the main antagonist is defeated, Lady Laibl’s and Lady Wisdoms’ cheating remains unsolved. Thus, Congreve brings to the stage not just a hypocritical hero, but a cunning manipulator who skillfully directs his own performance and tries on various roles from the uncomplaining servant to the tyrant.
Reference to article:
Vysokovich K. O. The motive of hypocrisy in W. Congreve’s comedy “The Double Dealerˮ // Ivanovo State University Bulletin. Series «The Humanities». 2021. No.1. P. 5-8.