The article is devoted to a new section of philosophical anthropology — noospheric anthropology. The ambivalence of the philosophical anthropology of the twentieth century, combining discrete and integrative orientations, is fixed. The legitimacy of the appearance of the phenomenon of digital anthropocentrism in the conditions of the information-digital revolution is shown. Modern anthropology is considered within the complementarity of onto-anthropology and deonto-anthropology. The selected models of Russian and foreign noosphere-oriented anthropologies are analyzed. The conclusion is drawn about their substantive and methodological complementarity. The specificity of the noospheric anthropology as deontological anthropology is revealed, its working definition as a field of noospherology is proposed. The ontological, epistemological, axiological and praxeological subject fields of the noospheric anthropology are determined.
Reference to article:
Melikyan M. A., Smirnov D. G. The hypostal worlds of noospheric anthropology: spontaneous additionality of real and perfect types // Ivanovo State University Bulletin. Series «The Humanities». 2021. No.4. P. 143–152.